Dimitris D.

To make this simple and easy to understand... it’s proven. There’s no mystery, she did it herself. The $MIKA sweep wasn’t caused by the leaked key. The transaction was already pre signed with a 👉🏻 durable nonce 👈🏻 long before the post. That’s why only one TX succeeded and every

@shuhyuh @mikadontlouz Here you are 💜 The on-chain receipts don’t lie. Here is the permanent ledger proof for $MIKA The Transfer: 500,440,996 MIKA tokens were swept into the dumping wallet (mQwS3h5...). The signing authority was the Coin Creator wallet itself (v82FX3f...). The Gas: The Coin Creator t.co/pi6yPClU6C

The Mika Wallet "Incident". The Actual On Chain Timeline... 18:40:09 CET The @mikadontlouz account posts a raw private key on X, instantly exposing full signing authority for the $MIKA developer wallet. 18:41:30 CET (81 seconds later) A single transaction clears on Solana: - 500,440.996 MIKA swept - ≈ $40,000 at the time - Destination: 58xp…FvjVCopy - TX: 3skkfzUQrZF2rcmrhAQV6SuLa7Hj3jPFu7cfXAHvkVep3Lk3fNSVypwULhqMRinsa6Zj5xjj8zKZBQ1agMxwuABZ Only one transaction succeeded. No bot drained the wallet. No outsider won a race. Here’s the technical reason. Key Detail: The Wallet Was a Durable Nonce Account Long before the leak, the wallet was configured with a durable nonce, a Solana feature that allows: - pre‑signing a transaction - binding it to a specific nonce slot - broadcasting it later - blocking all other transactions from using that slot This is confirmed directly by block metadata. What Actually Happened Technically👇🏻 A transaction was pre signed earlier. The outgoing MIKA transfer wasn’t created after the leak; it was already signed with a reserved nonce. After the key was posted, someone broadcasted the pre signed transaction. Broadcasting consumed the nonce instantly. Any bot or user trying to submit a new transaction with the leaked key hit: - nonce mismatch - nonce already used - invalid blockhash Systematic rejection, exactly how durable nonce accounts are designed to behave. Why the 81 Second Delay Matters If this were a real “key leak race,” bots would have drained the wallet in milliseconds. Instead: - one pre‑signed transaction - one reserved nonce - one broadcast - one successful sweep The chain shows intentional execution, not chaos. The private key leak did not give outsiders meaningful control. The sweep was pre planned and pre signed. The durable nonce guaranteed exclusive execution. The 81second gap reflects broadcast timing, not a race. The blockchain doesn’t care about narratives, it records facts. And the facts point to a controlled, pre signed exit...