@StarPlatinum_ thread on the Solana China event shutdown a day after CZ's comments
The thread recounts the Solana Foundation opening an office in Pudong, CZ remarking on it, and the first Shanghai event being cancelled with police at the venue less than 24 hours later. It drew far more reach than the author's usual posts.
Solana just had its event in China shut down. And the funniest part is that CZ basically warned about this one day earlier. First Solana Foundation announced that it has opened an office in Pudong, occupying one of the highest commercial office spaces All of this in a country where crypto is heavily restricted. A day before CZ notices Solana’s expansion and publicly comments on how surprising it is. He says it’s amazing that Solana can advertise and open an office in China. (Especially considering BNB Chain hasn’t been able to do the same) Sounds pretty reasonable, right? Well, less than 24 hours later… The first event was supposed to take place at the Shangri-La hotel in Shanghai. The event was scheduled to begin at 10 AM. Instead, attendees arrived to find police officers at the venue. You genuinely cannot make this stuff up. Around noon, organizers sent an apology email arguing “Venue logistics considerations.” CZ them posted: “Sad to see. Looks like they really didn’t know the local policies?” And reminded everyone that something similar had happened less than a year ago. I’ve seen people joking that he snitched on them. I actually respect Solana’s ambition to expand into one of the biggest markets But I think there’s a difference between building blockchain infrastructure in China and publicly promoting a crypto ecosystem This week Solana might have crossed that line and CZ is probably thinking he told them so.
1 more captured post in this submission
Sad to see. Looks like they really didn't know the local policies? But it's not the first time either, same thing happened less than a year ago: t.co/c2lI8p2r9w x.com/knowyourself51…
This quoted post was not captured.
Why this was filed here (confidence 75%)
- 457k impressions vs the author's ~8.5k median (~50x)
- quoted alongside @cz_binance's 1M-impression reply on the same story
- taxonomy 2026-10-16.1
