Fto

The Mika launch keeps getting worse. First, @mikadontlouz allegedly leaked her private key. In 90 seconds, 500M $MIKA was swapped for 380 SOL Then came a second token, with allegations that its dev wallet controlled 50% of the supply Meanwhile, an onchain tracker flagged 8 wallets buying 81.1% of the supply at launch Now snipers are publicly bragging about $20K profits Nothing proves it leak was staged, but the question remains: Who made money from all of this?

It’s worse than strange: • Posted & deleted solana:9cRC…pumpCopy 10 times
• @blknoiz06 "acquired" the account • Ansem says to follow, 370k+ see it
• It posts $KIMCHI / $ANSEM pair CA • Token dies in an hour, post is deleted
• Account claims he was never Ansem So who actually owns the handle lol?

Pumpfun killed the trenches Results from studies across the span of two months & over 15 million coins: • 50% died within 3 minutes • 17% of trades were washed • 98% of coins never graduated • 79% stopped trading after day one • Over 1.5 million tokens were replicas
• Top 1% of groups launched 60% of all tokens Memes don’t extract, @Pumpfun does.

I exposed Kimchi selling 75% of his token’s supply through bundled side wallets. But somehow, everything got worse. Less than 48h later, Kimchi promoted a SECOND token through a QR code. @a1lon9 reposted it, the token runs to nearly $15M market cap, Kimchi posts get deleted, and token collapses 98%. This is the guy Pumpfun just tried to present as the future of social trading. How did this happen TWO times alon?

This situation is getting worse… Kimchi posted a QR for his second token in 48 hours, @a1lon9 retweets it, and the token hits $11M instantly. Then: • Account allegedly hacked • Post deleted, token “fake” • Token dumps back to zero • Pumpfun removed from bio Who’s gonna take responsibility?